Abstract

Recent studies have underlined the importance of the distinction between “declarative” and “procedural” aspects of memory functioning. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the relative deficits in these two aspects of anterograde memory in an amnesic population with midline diencephalic lesions, to determine whether this apparently fundamental distinction in memory types is honored even under real-world conditions. Eight alcoholic Korsakoff patients were examined for their lexical acquisition capacity, including both their application of word-learning procedures to a new lexical domain and their eventual recall of the facts represented by the new word. The findings revealed that each Korsakoff patient successfully applies at least some of the procedures subserving the word-learning process to the new lexical domain. By comparison, the Korsakoff patients subsequently acquire little of the factual knowledge represented by the new word. Specifically, almost all of the patients recognize only the object used during the exposure period to demonstrate the new word. Quantitative and qualitative features of the patients' declarative and procedural memory deficits are discusses in the context of real-world processing advantages and limitations.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.