Abstract

Background The relationship between the levodopa challenge test (LDCT) and postoperative subthalamic nucleus-deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) benefits is controversial in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). We aim to evaluate the value of total levodopa response (TLR) and symptom levodopa response (SLR) in predicting postoperative improvement in different PD motor subtypes. Methods Studies were split into a training set (147 patients) and a validation set (304 patients). We retrospectively collected data from 147 patients who received the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale- (UPDRS-) III and the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire- (PDQ-) 39 evaluation. Patients were classified into tremor-dominant (TD), akinetic-rigid-dominant (AR), and mixed (MX) groups. Clinically important difference (CID) was employed to dichotomize DBS effects. For patients in each subtype group from the training set, we used the correlation and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses to explore the strength of their relations. Areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated and compared through the DeLong test. Results developed from the training set were applied into the validation set to predict postoperative improvement in different PD motor subtypes. Results In the validation cohort, TLR significantly correlated with postoperative motor (p < 0.001) and quality of life (QOL) (p < 0.001) improvement in the MX group. The AUC between TLR and UPDRS-III (TU) is 0.800. The AUC between TLR and PDQ-39 (TP) is 0.770. An associated criterion in both TU and TP is around 50%. In the AR group, strong correlation was only found in SLR and PDQ-39 (SP) (p < 0.001). And the AUC of SP is significantly larger than that in TLR and PDQ-39 (TP) (p = 0.034). An associated criterion in SP is around 37%. No significant correlation was found in the TD group. Conclusions We provide a more accurate judgment for LDCT. TLR strongly correlated with postoperative UPDRS-III and PDQ-39 improvement in MX patients. A TLR > 50% may indicate a higher possibility of clinically meaningful benefits from STN-DBS comparing to medication only. SLR can well predict QOL improvement in AR patients. Similarly, a SLR > 37% may indicate a higher possibility of clinically significant benefits from STN-DBS. LDCT provides limited information for TD patients.

Highlights

  • Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease with two main therapies of levodopa and deep brain stimulation (DBS)

  • Age at onset, duration of motor fluctuation, Hoehn-Yahr stage, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale- (UPDRS-)III off scores, Levodopa response (LR) for akinetic-rigid score, LEDD, Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire- (PDQ-)39, and Hamilton anxiety rating scale (HAMA) scores were significantly different between the three groups

  • A total levodopa response (TLR) > 50% may indicate a higher possibility of clinically meaningful benefits from subthalamic nucleus-deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease with two main therapies of levodopa and deep brain stimulation (DBS). The LR toward particular symptoms calculated by UPDRS subitems, which we termed as “symptom levodopa response (SLR)” to distinguish from total levodopa response (TLR), might better predict STNDBS efficiency in a certain group of patients. We employed both the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and correlation analysis to explore the predictive value of LDCT in different PD motor subtypes. The relationship between the levodopa challenge test (LDCT) and postoperative subthalamic nucleus-deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) benefits is controversial in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). TLR strongly correlated with postoperative UPDRS-III and PDQ-39 improvement in MX patients.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.