Abstract
When the VGG16 model was applied to fish picture classification, the overall accuracy was a remarkable 99%, demonstrating strong performance over most of the dataset. Still, a thorough assessment of the model's efficacy necessitates a look beyond its general accuracy. A more detailed evaluation is possible thanks to class-specific metrics like precision, recall, and F1-score, which provide information on how well the model performs on particular classes. Although the high overall accuracy is encouraging, more research into these metrics and the possibility of class imbalances should be taken into account to guarantee consistent performance in the fish image classification challenge across all categories. A more comprehensive assessment of the model's effectiveness benefits from a contextual knowledge of the application domain and a careful examination of evaluation measures.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.