Abstract

BackgroundIdentifying scalable strategies for assessing fidelity is a key challenge in implementation science. However, for psychosocial interventions, the existing, reliable ways to test treatment fidelity quality are often labor intensive, and less burdensome strategies may not reflect actual clinical practice. Cognitive behavioral therapies (CBTs) provide clinicians with a set of effective core elements to help treat a multitude of disorders, which, evidence suggests, need to be delivered with fidelity to maximize potential client impact. The current “gold standard” for rating CBTs is rating recordings of therapy sessions, which is extremely time-consuming and requires a substantial amount of initial training. Although CBTs can vary based on the target disorder, one common element employed in most CBTs is the use of worksheets to identify specific behaviors and thoughts that affect a client’s ability to recover. The present study will develop and evaluate an innovative new approach to rate CBT fidelity, by developing a universal CBT scoring system based on worksheets completed in therapy sessions.MethodsTo develop a scoring system for CBT worksheets, we will compile common CBT elements from a variety of CBT worksheets for a range of psychiatric disorders and create adherence and competence measures. We will collect archival worksheets from past studies to test the scoring system and assess test-retest reliability. To evaluate whether CBT worksheet scoring accurately reflects clinician fidelity, we will recruit clinicians who are engaged in a CBT for depression, anxiety, and/or posttraumatic stress disorder. Clinicians and clients will transmit routine therapy materials produced in session (e.g., worksheets, clinical notes, session recordings) to the study team after each session. We will compare observer-rated fidelity, clinical notes, and fidelity-rated worksheets to identify the most effective and efficient method to assess clinician fidelity. Clients will also be randomly assigned to either complete the CBT worksheets on paper forms or on a mobile application (app) to learn if worksheet format influences clinician and client experience or differs in terms of reflecting fidelity.DiscussionScoring fidelity using CBT worksheets may allow clinics to test fidelity in a short and effective manner, enhancing continuous quality improvement in the workplace. Clinicians and clinics can use such data to improve clinician fidelity in real time, leading to improved patient outcomes.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03479398. Retrospectively registered March 20, 2018.

Highlights

  • Identifying scalable strategies for assessing fidelity is a key challenge in implementation science

  • Some research suggests that many providers do not implement Evidence-based psychosocial treatment (EBPT) with fidelity [12,13,14], and a recent study determined that there was no relationship between self-reported primary cognitive behavioral theoretical orientation and observer-rated Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) competence [15]

  • We aim to (1) develop a scalable general CBT quality measure based on work samples rather than self-report or observation and (2) to evaluate the reliability, validity, and feasibility of different strategies for collecting these materials

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Identifying scalable strategies for assessing fidelity is a key challenge in implementation science. Cognitive behavioral therapies (CBTs) provide clinicians with a set of effective core elements to help treat a multitude of disorders, which, evidence suggests, need to be delivered with fidelity to maximize potential client impact. Decades of research has demonstrated that cognitive behavioral therapies (CBTs) are effective for a wide variety of psychiatric problems and diagnoses [1] Given this strong evidence base, CBT is cited as a first-line treatment in treatment guidelines for a variety of mood and anxiety disorders [2, 3] as well as for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) [4, 5]. State, and regional mental health systems are implementing CBTs, requiring clinicians to offer them to their clients as clinically appropriate [6, 7] To date, these efforts have largely focused on provider training and outcome monitoring, with less emphasis on ongoing quality assurance [8, 9]. Articulates, policymakers, healthcare administrators, insurance providers, consumers, and other stakeholders need feasible methods of assessing the quality of services that are being delivered

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call