Abstract

Effectively mitigating climate change entails a quick upscaling and redirection of electricity infrastructure investment towards clean power. Given that the bulk of greenhouse gas emissions increases until 2050 will come from low- and middle-income countries, finding cost-effective ways to mitigate climate change while meeting development targets is essential. However, recent research has shown some of the limitations of broad financing mechanisms, such as the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and existing carbon markets. This has resulted in a growing interest in designing novel investment support schemes, such as modifications of feed-in tariffs (FiTs) that may be more cost effective and better targeted towards particular outcomes when compared to traditional deployment subsidies or broad financing mechanisms. We evaluate the design and outcomes of one such novel support schemes: the GET FiT (Global Energy Transfer Feed-in Tariff) investment support scheme in Uganda, which has attracted ~ 453 million USD in private sector investment for 17 small-scale renewable energy projects (solar, hydro, bagasse) in only three years. Using financial modelling on detailed project-level data, we find that most projects were additional and would therefore not have been built without the subsidy. In addition, using firm-level panel data, we show that power outages hamper manufacturing performance in Uganda. In the absence of reliable outage-data for the entire Ugandan territory, we use nightlight variations to proxy changes in outages. We show that outages have declined substantially since the introduction of GET FiT. Yet, our analysis also demonstrates that programmes to incentivise additional renewable generation in developing countries funded internationally or domestically should liaise closely with grid authorities to ensure that supply does not outstrip demand.

Highlights

  • For many countries in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) unreliable and insufficient power supply poses a substantial challenge to poverty alleviation and economic development

  • We first discuss whether the Global Energy Transfer Feed-in Tariffs (GET feed-in tariff (FiT)) support led to the construction of power plants that would not have been built without the GET FiT programme (Section 5.1)

  • While around 70% of debt funding came from development finance institutions, it is important to note that four out of 17 projects were financed through private sector loans

Read more

Summary

Introduction

For many countries in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) unreliable and insufficient power supply poses a substantial challenge to poverty alleviation and economic development. We contribute to filling this gap in the literature by investigating the design and local economic impacts of one of the first schemes in developing countries aimed at crowding in private capital for the construction and operation of renewable power generation assets: The Global Energy Transfer Feed-in Tariffs (GET FiT). Within three years, it attracted ~453 million USD in private sector investment for 17 medium-sized renewable electricity projects. In order to study the local economic effects and the influence of outages on firm productivity, we use detailed manufacturing and nightlight data to study whether the new power plants are reducing outages.

Overview of different approaches to incentivise private sector involvement
Measuring financial and emissions additionality
Measuring the economic impact of reduced outages
The GET FiT programme
Data and methods
Results
Financial additionality
Impact of outages on firm productivity in Uganda
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call