Abstract

Behavioral cues play a significant part in human communication and cognitive perception. In most professional domains, employee recruitment policies are framed such that both professional skills and personality traits are adequately assessed. Hiring interviews are structured to evaluate expansively a potential employee’s suitability for the position - their professional qualifications, interpersonal skills, ability to perform in critical and stressful situations, in the presence of time and resource constraints, etc. Candidates, therefore, need to be aware of their positive and negative attributes and be mindful of behavioral cues that might have adverse effects on their success. We propose a multimodal analytical framework that analyzes the candidate in an interview scenario and provides feedback for predefined labels such as engagement, speaking rate, eye contact, etc. We perform a comprehensive analysis that includes the interviewee’s facial expressions, speech, and prosodic information, using the video, audio, and text transcripts obtained from the recorded interview. We use these multimodal data sources to construct a composite representation, which is used for training machine learning classifiers to predict the class labels. Such analysis is then used to provide constructive feedback to the interviewee for their behavioral cues and body language. Experimental validation showed that the proposed methodology achieved promising results.

Highlights

  • In the business world, interviews are a prerequisite to personnel recruitment for assessing the candidates through a structured interaction and discus-∗equal contribution sion either on a one-to-one basis or by a panel of interviewers

  • The field of personality computing focuses on automatically analyzing such essential insights into the psyche of a person based on their behavior, verbal responses and non-verbal actions, speech patterns, body language, etc (Vinciarelli and Mohammadi, 2014)

  • For extensively evaluating the proposed multimodal analytics pipeline, various combinations of prosodic, visual, and lexical features were experimented with, and used to train the four different classifiers, discussed in Section 3. each classifier is trained to predict from 9 different class labels - eye contact, speaking rate, engaged, pauses, calmness, not stresses, focused, authentic, and not awkward

Read more

Summary

Introduction

∗equal contribution sion either on a one-to-one basis or by a panel of interviewers It is an opportunity for the candidates to prove that they are qualified for the position, and for recruiters to assess the job-to-candidate fit. Such recruiters are trained in evaluating a candidate’s personality, thought patterns, behavior under stressful situations, and emotional intelligence through well-established metrics through technical analysis, psychometric testing, etc. The significant difference between verbal and non-verbal communication is that the former is specific and interpreted, while the latter is subtle and implied. Both channels of communication affect conversational dynamics and influence the relationship between individuals (Somant and Madan, 2015)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call