Abstract

Since bearing deterioration patterns are difficult to collect from real, long lifetime scenarios, data-driven research has been directed towards recovering them by imposing accelerated life tests. Consequently, insufficiently recovered features due to rapid damage propagation seem more likely to lead to poorly generalized learning machines. Knowledge-driven learning comes as a solution by providing prior assumptions from transfer learning. Likewise, the absence of true labels was able to create inconsistency related problems between samples, and teacher-given label behaviors led to more ill-posed predictors. Therefore, in an attempt to overcome the incomplete, unlabeled data drawbacks, a new autoencoder has been designed as an additional source that could correlate inputs and labels by exploiting label information in a completely unsupervised learning scheme. Additionally, its stacked denoising version seems to more robustly be able to recover them for new unseen data. Due to the non-stationary and sequentially driven nature of samples, recovered representations have been fed into a transfer learning, convolutional, long–short-term memory neural network for further meaningful learning representations. The assessment procedures were benchmarked against recent methods under different training datasets. The obtained results led to more efficiency confirming the strength of the new learning path.

Highlights

  • A successful conditional preventive maintenance program relies entirely on precise real-time monitoring, is capable of prior detection of any failure suspicion, and stands on a well-structured prognosis policy [1]

  • Prior to the training process, the two data sets were divided into training and testing sets bPyrciroorssto-vtahliedatrtiaoinnionngkptirmoceessosf,ttrhaientinwgosadmatpalesse(tks =w4e)r. eTodpivroidveedthienctoaptarbaiilnitiynogfathned testing sleeatsrnbinygcsrcohsesm-veadliedsaigtinoend oinntkhetiHmIersegorfestsriaoinnipnrgobslaemm,pwleesfi(rkst=te4s)t.eTdoeapcrhocvoentthriebuctaiopnability of tsheepalreaatrenlyi.ngWescchoemmpeardedestihgenefudllinTLthaelgHorIithremgrtehsastiolenveprraogbeslelmab,ewls einffiorrsmt taetsiotend(TeLaCch- contribLuSTtiMon) tsoeiptsartraatnelsyfe.rWleearcnoinmgpvaerresidonth(LeCfu-LlSl TTML)a, Clg-oLrSiTthMm, atnhdatLSleTvMer, aregsepseclatibveellsy.iTnhfoermation ctuorvietsfittrtianngsfoefrFliegaurrnei1n2govnetrhseiotnest(LseCts-LpSrTovMe)i,tsCh-iLgShTeMr a,papnrodxiLmSaTtiMon, respectaibvieliltyy

  • CreasTedhh.ee ccuurrreennt tacaccucruarcaycfyorfmorumlauwlaaswdaessidgneseidgtnoeodbtsoerovbestehrevneutmhebenruomf ebrerorros finertrhoers in the llaattee aFannodrd ieenaasrrtlalyncpper,eFdiigcuttiirooenn1ss,3,bbeexecpcaaluausineseslatlahtetaretrpaplrlerdoefdicittchioteinodsnewssiwegrneerdheahprramerdfmuiclftuaolnrsadnatrdheetmheeoasreltaylrilokyneleoysnes were mewaoerlrryee emdsetoimmreadtnoedrmsinaognfdoHinnIg. mHoaoniwnmetveainenrat,entnhcaenrdceeessroiegusnorecudersca.elsgI.toIratiltasholmsosh(sTohLwoCwe-LeddStThtMhee)cchooannscceaennbtterratattetiioronanpoo-ff values tpvorawoluxaiermsdasttoitwohnaeravdnasdlutaheeb1ev:ttatelhrueeach1ci:ugrthaheceyr htbhiygehscehoronwthcieenngctormnaoctieroenntcrowantiacoesnn, twrhaeatismo, ntohtroeewmaacorcdruesrvaaaccclyuueirna1ccytrheainns-ed

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A successful conditional preventive maintenance program relies entirely on precise real-time monitoring, is capable of prior detection of any failure suspicion, and stands on a well-structured prognosis policy [1]. Remaining useful life (RUL) is very crucial for prognosis, taking place as the primary measure of health assessment [2]. It is mainly based either on the estimation of useful time until the complete failure of such a system or on the provision of a probability or any other important information indicating its current operational performance. For some machines such as bearings, collecting these large deterioration patterns seems most likely impossible due to their long lifetime It seeks to recover patterns of progressive damage propagation by imposing accelerated life tests to collect patterns similar to the real ones as an alternative solution. Even if these data are stored correctly, the real labels are still missing, and the short lifespan could not be considered as a ground truth label

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call