Abstract

Background: Primary lack or secondary loss of response to therapy with infliximab is a significant problem. This study aimed to evaluate the response to treatment in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) achieving therapeutic and sub-therapeutic trough levels of biosimilar infliximab (CT-P13). Results: A total of 65 patients (32 with CD and 33 with UC) were recruited. The overall response rate in both CD and UC patients exceeded 80%. There were no significant differences in treatment response and CT-P13 levels for patients with CD or UC. We did not find significant differences in the percentage of patients achieving drug levels of 3 μg/mL at week 6, 10, or 12; a significant decrease was observed at week 14. Up to 55.5% of patients with CD and 64.3% of patients with UC with sub-therapeutic CT-P13 levels at week 14 primarily responded to treatment. Conclusions: Intermediate measurements of drug levels at weeks 10 and 12 did not capture any pronounced decrease in infliximab concentrations below therapeutic levels in either group, thus suggesting no clinical usefulness. A significant percentage of patients primarily responded to treatment despite sub-therapeutic drug levels after the induction phase.

Highlights

  • Who qualified for biosimilar the biosimilar infliximab (CT-P13, Patients with who qualified for the infliximab (CT-P13, RemRemsima) treatment within drug programs were consecutively enrolled between sima) [20] treatment within drug programs were consecutively enrolled between 2017 and at theIBD

  • For Crohn’s disease (CD), the analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.727, loss of response

  • For CD, the analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.727, CI95 [0.537; 0.916] indicating satisfactory differentiation of patients by the selected diagCI95 [0.537; 0.916] indicating satisfactory differentiation of patients by the selected diagnosnostic test

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Three classes of biologics are available for the treatment of IBD: TNF inhibitors, adhesion molecule inhibitors, and anti-interleukin (IL) drugs. CT-P13 is frequently used as an effective and safe alternative for original infliximab (IFX) [7,8,9,10] While it is an important drug in IBD treatment, a significant problem may be the primary lack or secondary loss of response (LOR) to therapy. Their prevention is an important subject addressed in clinical trials [11,12,13]. Primary lack or secondary loss of response to therapy with infliximab is a significant problem. We did not find significant differences in the percentage of patients achieving drug levels of

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call