Abstract

Keratinocyte cancers (KC) are common and pose a significant financial burden globally. Ultraviolet radiation is a significant factor in their development, through mutagenesis promotion but also through local and systemic immunosuppression. Although systemic immunosuppression is well understood, cutaneous immunity has been more difficult to evaluate. This study used a contact sensitizer, diphencyprone (DPCP), which elicits a contact hypersensitivity reaction in skin, to compare the degree of reactivity to DPCP in patients with a high KC burden versus those with a low KC burden. A prospective study was performed in immunocompetent patients aged 70±5years of age, comparing patients with a high KC burden (>10 previous KC) with those with a low KC burden (<2 previous KC). All patients were sensitized with 2% DPCP and then patch tested two weeks later with eight different concentrations of DPCP with the threshold concentration and total degree of reaction recorded. Nine patients were recruited, 5 in the 'high cancer' group and 4 in the 'low cancer' group. All patients were Fitzpatrick skin type 1 or 2. All patients developed a reaction to DPCP. Patients in the low cancer group developed a reaction at a significantly lower threshold DPCP concentration than the high cancer group (P=0.039). The cumulative intensity of reaction was higher in the low cancer group (P=0.087). Patients with a high KC burden required a higher threshold concentration of DPCP to elicit a hypersensitivity reaction, supporting the concept of a lower skin immunity in these patients. DPCP reactivity threshold could be a useful tool in the evaluation of skin immunity and propensity to develop keratinocyte cancers.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.