Abstract
The current study sought to determine the flow level of students at Taif University’s College of Designs and Applied Arts and the disparities in average student grades based on gender, specialization, and academic level. The sample was drawn randomly from Taif University’s College of Designs and Applied Arts and included (51) male and (138) female students majoring in arts, graphic design, interior design, fashion design, and textiles. The flow scale was produced by Al-Ghamdi (2021). Overall, there is an average flow level among the sample members, with no statistically significant gender differences in flow in the first, second, and sixth dimensions, but there are disparities in flow in the third, fourth, and fifth dimensions. Aside from one group (interior design, graphic design) that favored interior design, there were no statistically significant changes in flow related to expertise. According to the data, there were no statistically significant differences in the flow due to the dimensions’ academic level variables (1st–6th). However, there were differences between the sample members in both dimensions (3rd–5th). Anxiety and tension, a lack of clarity of objectives, and dissatisfaction with the results were identified as the main reasons that impede the flow. Enrichment programs and material support were developed to boost student flow at Taif University’s College of Designs and Applied Arts.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.