Abstract

Wildlife management, conservation interventions and wildlife research programs often involve capture, manipulation and transport of wild animals. Widespread empirical evidence across various vertebrate taxa shows that handling wildlife generally induces a severe stress response resulting in increased stress levels. The inability of individuals to appropriately respond to rapidly changing environmental conditions during and after manipulations may have deleterious and long-lasting implications on animal welfare. Therefore, mitigating stress responses in the frame of conservation interventions is a key animal welfare factor. However, we have a poor understanding of the metrics to adequately assess and monitor the dynamic physiological changes that animals undergo when subjected to stressful procedures in wild or captive conditions. A growing number of studies provide good evidence for reciprocal interactions between immune processes and stress. Here, we review the existing literature on a relatively new technique—Leukocyte Coping Capacity (LCC), a proxy for stress quantifying oxygen radical production by leukocytes. We discuss the strength and weaknesses of this immunological approach to evaluate stress, the individual capacity to cope with stress and the resulting potential implications for animal welfare. Additionally we present new data on LCC in captive roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) under long-time anesthesia and free-ranging Asiatic wild asses (Kulan; Equus hemionus kulan) were LCC was used to assess stress levels in animals captured for a reintroduction project.

Highlights

  • Nikolaus Huber 1*, Valeria Marasco 2,3, Johanna Painer 1,2, Sebastian G

  • Animals in the caging system exhibited significantly lower Leukocyte Coping Capacity (LCC) responses when compared to animals held in open rooms, indicating that cage housing is associated with diminished immune function as well as higher stress levels and impaired welfare [104]

  • Moberg [18] stated that the biological cost of mounting a stress response is the key to determine the welfare implications of potential stressors and would be more relevant when compared to other measures of stress such as physiological or behavioral changes [17, 18]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Nikolaus Huber 1*, Valeria Marasco 2,3, Johanna Painer 1,2, Sebastian G. It is key to assess and quantify how and to which extent differing stressors such as those provoked during wildlife and conservation management activities (i.e., capture, handling, transport, relocation) impact on individual responses and on animal welfare [36, 37].

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call