Abstract

We agree that amenable mortality is useful as a macro-level "tin-opener" to identify potential gaps in healthcare delivery – as it was originally intended (and as it was described in the CIHI 2012 Health Indicators Report). We also agree that a good indicator of health system effectiveness should be sensitive to outcomes under the control of the health system. While measuring population health is important for some purposes, we also need to know if people are getting timely access to high-quality care. And so, perhaps most importantly, we agree that finding measures that are more sensitive to health system effectiveness than total mortality is a high priority.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.