Abstract

Does letter-form constrain errors in peripheral dyslexia? In Hebrew, 5 of the 22 letters have two different letter forms, one is used only when the letter occurs in word-final position, the other form is used in initial and middle positions. Is the information on final-forms encoded in the letter identity information and used for word identification, or is it discarded? The current research explored this question through the effect of final vs. non final letter form on the error pattern in neglect dyslexia (neglexia) and letter position dyslexia (LPD). Left word-based neglexia results in errors of omission, substitution and addition of letters in the left side of words, which in Hebrew is the end of the word. We examined whether final letter form blocks the addition of letters to the end of the word and whether omissions of letters after letters in non-final form are avoided. The predominant error type in LPD is migration of letters within words. We tested whether migrations also occur when they cause form change of either final-form letters that move to middle position or middle-form letters that move to final position. These questions were assessed in both acquired and developmental neglexia and LPD. The results indicated a strong effect of final letter-form on acquired neglexia and on acquired and developmental LPD, which almost completely prevented form-changing errors. This effect was not found in developmental neglexia, where words that end in final-form letters were actually more impaired than other words, probably because final-form letters appear only on the neglected side of the word for Hebrew-reading children with left developmental neglexia. These data show that early visuo-orthographic analysis is sensitive to final letter form and that final letter form constrains errors in peripheral dyslexia.

Highlights

  • The first stage of word reading includes the extraction of letter identities from the written word

  • The results indicated that errors in acquired neglexia are sensitive to letter form and almost never create a word that is ill-formed, that contains final-form letter in middle position or middle-form letter in final position

  • The analysis looked at words that had more than one possible lexical error, one violating final form requirements and at least one other that does not violate letter form. This analysis showed that while there was no clear preference for omission or addition when the words did not include a final-form letter, there was a clear refraining from omission and addition when they caused violation of letter form, and preference for the other error type when it allowed avoiding formchange, see Table 3 for additions vs. other errors and Table 4 for omissions vs. other errors (Participant MH was excluded from this type of analysis because he produced many non-lexical responses and we could not do the analysis of lexical potentials for him)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The first stage of word reading includes the extraction of letter identities from the written word This requires abstracting away from the size of the letters, their case, font, beauty of handwriting and many other aspects of the written letters [1,2,3,6]. The current study asked whether we ignore letter forms that reflect, in addition to letter identity, letter position, or whether such letter forms are encoded. This question was explored through the examination of whether this type of information modulates errors in peripheral dyslexias. Example (3) presents two words that compose only the letters /m/ – which appears as in initial and middle position and in final position, and the letter /c/ – in initial and middle position and in final position, one word is read “cimcem” and means “reduced”, the other word reads “micmec” and means “blinked” – these words show the use of the same letter in the two forms

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.