Abstract
Circulation presents a provocative juxtaposition of the polarized opinions of Zipes1 and Kroll et al2 on whether the TASER electronic control device (ECD) can induce ventricular fibrillation by an action of precordially administered TASER discharge. The debate is focused on the 8 cases studied by Zipes.1 This issue is of some importance, as an understanding of the range of clinical effects of ECDs can, and should, inform the circumstances in which these devices are used and what medical contingencies might be needed …
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
