Abstract

To the Editor: We read with interest that Goel et al1 have determined that cardiac rehabilitation (CR) reduces morbidity and mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention. We agree their findings add weight to the limited published data examining patient outcomes from CR after percutaneous coronary intervention. In essence, these findings support the large body of evidence that has shown that patients who participate in secondary prevention and CR have significantly better outcomes than those who do not.2 However, Goel et al note that the nonparticipants in CR in their study were older and female, and …

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call