Abstract
We read the recent article by Bradley et al1 published in Circulation with great interest. In their study, a significant decrease in the use of nonacute percutaneous coronary intervention was noted after the launch of the appropriateness use criteria for revascularization, and this finding coincided with an improvement in appropriate ratings for coronary revascularization over the study period. The presented data are encouraging, albeit 1 finding deserves specific mention. The authors showed a decreasing trend of mapping failure with …
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
