Abstract
To the Editor: We read with interest the recent article by Gold et al,1 who concluded that T-wave alternans (TWA) should not be used to make clinical decisions for patients with symptomatic heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction. The accompanying editorial2 underscored as a major limitation the study’s use of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) discharge as a surrogate marker for sudden cardiac death, referencing a meta-analysis3 that demonstrated a dramatic difference in the predictive power of TWA if ICD-detected events were included or excluded. Although performing a TWA substudy within a large ICD trial was considered a major advantage,1 inclusion of ICD therapy actually prevented the determination of TWA’s prediction of clinical sudden death. An analysis excluding ICD-detected end points could be beneficial. However, end-point …
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.