Abstract
To the Editor: We read with interest the article by Webb et al,1 demonstrating that, 5 years after coronary surgery, radial artery (RA) grafts have a preserved flow-mediated vasodilatation, whereas saphenous vein (SV) grafts have not. We agree with the authors that these results may provide insight into the more favorable patency of the RA graft over the SV graft, because the RA grafts preserved their ability to autoregulate their diameter in response to changes in myocardial flow physiology. However, some considerations about the SV graft should be highlighted. First, although the results represent a situation 5 years after the surgery, it is important to know the …
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.