Abstract

To the Editor: We read with interest the article by Webb et al,1 demonstrating that, 5 years after coronary surgery, radial artery (RA) grafts have a preserved flow-mediated vasodilatation, whereas saphenous vein (SV) grafts have not. We agree with the authors that these results may provide insight into the more favorable patency of the RA graft over the SV graft, because the RA grafts preserved their ability to autoregulate their diameter in response to changes in myocardial flow physiology. However, some considerations about the SV graft should be highlighted. First, although the results represent a situation 5 years after the surgery, it is important to know the …

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call