Abstract
This is the first study to assess the effect of suspects' ethnic identity on pre-trial detention decisions across the ethnic identity of the deciding judges. Concentrating on the early-stage decisions in the criminal process, controlling for the state's position and for the ethnicity of the judges, and excluding agreements, allows us to better control of intervening factors, and for evaluating competing explanations of the findings under assumptions of incomplete information. The multi-level analyses draw on a sample of pretrial detention decisions in three Israeli magistrate courts. We find that the ethnicity of suspects carries a significantly different effect between Arab and Jewish judges. When the judge is Jewish, a Jewish defendant has significantly higher chances of being released on bail than a similarly situated Arab suspect. Yet, while an average inverse bias was found for Arab Judges, the ethnic identity of the defendant was not found to have a significant effect in this condition. The implications of the findings, as well as the merit of concentrating on early-stage judicial decisions in the study of judicial ethnic bias are discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.