LESSONS LEARNT FROM SOIL IMPROVEMENT CASE STUDIES

Abstract

In Saudi Arabia two methods of soil improvement have been customarily employed. They are soil improvement by means of stone columns, and soil improvement by means of controlled modulus columns, that is CMC. Each of these methods have their own challenges to offer. Experience has shown that the sub-surface geology of the coastal areas of Saudi Arabia are marked with deep layers of poor soil termed locally as sabkha soil. Test results have determined that sabkha soil is known to have low shear strength, high soil compressibility, and high concentration of chlorides and sulphates which are corrosive to concrete, steel, and other construction materials. Design of foundations over a sabkha deposit remains a challenge and requires soil improvement. The CMC installation utilizes reverse flight augers, which displaces the soil laterally. However, it offers a huge challenge of post-operation trimming and cutting of CMCs. for stone columns, soil is removed during the drilling operation creating environmental issue. It also offers challenges as the huge impact during its operation are likely to damage the underground utilities. The environmental issues thus created can pose yet other challenge. This research paper is a case study that collates the experiences of soil improvement methods employed on a project in Saudi Arabia – vis-à-vis their advantages and the challenges encountered.