Abstract
Reflective cracking through jointed concrete pavement overlays has been a persistent problem. Several different rehabilitation strategies have been used in Texas. This paper is a summary of the performance of strategies used in the past 10 years. The performance of the crack-retarding grid has been disappointing as it has been related to several premature failures. Only one project has realized a benefit of the crack-retarding grid, where the reflective cracking was delayed by about 1 year. The writers believe the small openings in the crack-retarding grid and the lack of an effective bond may be the causes of the layer separation. A proprietary crack-retarding asphalt material has been performing well over two years of monitoring. In one experimental project, 100% of the cracks reflected through conventional overlay material in the first year. Both Petromat fabric underseal and crack-retarding asphalt material have been performing satisfactorily to retard reflective cracking. However, there is a large cost difference between these two treatments. Seven experimental treatments on a major section of US 59 were evaluated. The worst-performing section on the US 59 project was the break-and-seat method, which failed due to weak subgrade support. The weak subgrade is unable to support cracked concrete, which leads to a rocking action under traffic loads. It is concluded that for future projects, the break-and-seat method should not be applied on subgrade with a dynamic cone penetrometer penetration rate exceeding 25 mm per blow. A flexible base overlay with thin asphalt surfacing and the Arkansas (large stone) mix have performed well. Flexible base overlays were able to absorb the joint movement and eliminate the reflective cracking. The flexible base should be of top quality with very low moisture susceptibility. In Texas, this involves specifying a Texas triaxial Class 1 material with classification of “good” in suction/dielectric tests. It is also critical to provide an effective seal for the flexible base. A chip seal followed by a thin 75-mm hot mix layer is recommended.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.