Abstract

AbstractCerebral palsy is a pathological condition whose prevention and treatment have been immensely studied by experts in perinatal medicine and pediatric neurology. Despite this, it is still one of the main concerns nowadays in many countries, not only for scientific reasons but for legal ones also. For instance, in Japan, an increase in lawsuits relating to cerebral palsy was observed more than a decade ago, after healthcare resources in perinatal medicine had increasingly shrunk and had become fragile under the growing burden for physicians and midwives to provide advanced treatment, emergent care, high-risk treatment, and so on. Young physicians did not specialize in obstetrics because of the increased burden, which gave rise to a vicious cycle of shrinking resources in perinatal medicine. To address this issue, the Japan Obstetric Compensation System for Cerebral Palsy (JOCS-CP) was urgently introduced in 2009 to investigate, develop preventive measures, and award monetary compensation on a no-fault basis, with the Japan Council for Quality Health Care (JQ) as its operating organization (Fig. 33.1). It has so far produced annual reports on the prevention of cerebral palsy for nine consecutive years including numerical data and specific themes relating to the occurrence and prevention of cerebral palsy. The success of the system is a good reference for responding to adverse events which may happen in and have a vast impact on perinatal care. Therefore, this chapter focuses on cerebral palsy with primary reference to materials published by the JOCS-CP in the field of perinatal medicine. The aim of this chapter is to learn about the issues mentioned above and to discuss the significance and impact of introducing a nationwide system like the JOCS-CP. It describes knowledge and idea to questions of “Why cerebral palsy is highlighted among adverse event in obstetrics?”, “How the no-fault compensation/investigation/prevention system could be introduced?”, “What has been achieved by the system?”, and “How cerebral palsy is prevented?”.

Highlights

  • Cerebral palsy is a pathological condition whose prevention and treatment have been immensely studied by experts in perinatal medicine and pediatric neurology

  • It describes knowledge and idea to questions of “Why cerebral palsy is highlighted among adverse event in obstetrics?”, “How the no-fault compensation/investigation/prevention system could be introduced?”, “What has been achieved by the system?”, and “How cerebral palsy is prevented?”

  • A unique national compensation scheme should be devised to cover cases of accidents 33 Lessons Learned from the Japan Obstetric Compensation System for Cerebral Palsy: A Novel System... 467 not attributed to a medical procedure conducted by a physician, that is, cases that were inevitable during clinical care

Read more

Summary

33.1 Context for the Introduction of the JOCS-CP

Increasing Conflict Over Cerebral Palsy and Hopes for a No-Fault Compensation System. In the early 2000s, concerns about patient safety, the shortage of obstetricians and pediatricians, and low national birth rates rapidly emerged in Japan This eventually prompted the JMA to publish a report entitled “Toward Compensation in Cases Related to Medical Management and Procedures” in January of 2006. In response to high expectations, JQ established in 2007 the Division of Introductory Work on the Japan Obstetric Compensation System for Cerebral Palsy (JOCS-CP) as a temporary agent to introduce the JOCS-CP in Japanese healthcare system At this point, it should be noted that political decision added momentum to the growing demand by academic society to launch the JOCS-CP; JQ was considered to be the right choice to operate the JOCS-CP because it was a neutral body related to quality and safety improvement in healthcare. The JOCS-CP was launched on the 1st of January 2009, and has been in operation since, undergoing a revision in 2015 that saw the expansion of eligibility criteria with the full support of stakeholders

33.2 The Meaning of “No-Fault Compensation” in the JOCS-CP
33.3 Compensation Driven by the Indemnity Insurance Mechanism
33.4 Monetary Compensation
33.5 Epidemiology of Adverse Events
33.6 Investigation
Sub-committees
33.7 Controversy on Disclosing Preventability in Individual Cases
33.8 Survey on the Investigative Report
33.9 Most Frequent Errors
Prevention—Frequent errors and thematic analysis
33.11 Two Clinical Cases
33.11.1 Case 1
33.11.1.4 Recommendations For the clinic
33.11.2 Case 2
33.11.2.4 Recommendations For the hospital
33.12 Recommendations
33.12.1 Vacuum Delivery For obstetricians
33.12.3 Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring
33.12.4 Care for Placental Abruption
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.