Abstract

BackgroundVarious forms of Clinical Ethics Support (CES) have been developed in health care organizations. Over the past years, increasing attention has been paid to the question of how to foster the quality of ethics support. In the Netherlands, a CES quality assessment project based on a responsive evaluation design has been implemented. CES practitioners themselves reflected upon the quality of ethics support within each other’s health care organizations. This study presents a qualitative evaluation of this Responsive Quality Assessment (RQA) project.MethodsCES practitioners’ experiences with and perspectives on the RQA project were collected by means of ten semi-structured interviews. Both the data collection and the qualitative data analysis followed a stepwise approach, including continuous peer review and careful documentation of the decisions.ResultsThe main findings illustrate the relevance of the RQA with regard to fostering the quality of CES by connecting to context specific issues, such as gaining support from upper management and to solidify CES services within health care organizations. Based on their participation in the RQA, CES practitioners perceived a number of changes regarding CES in Dutch health care organizations after the RQA: acknowledgement of the relevance of CES for the quality of care; CES practices being more formalized; inspiration for developing new CES-related activities and more self-reflection on existing CES practices.ConclusionsThe evaluation of the RQA shows that this method facilitates an open learning process by actively involving CES practitioners and their concrete practices. Lessons learned include that “servant leadership” and more intensive guidance of RQA participants may help to further enhance both the critical dimension and the learning process within RQA.

Highlights

  • Various forms of Clinical Ethics Support (CES) have been developed in health care organizations

  • We address the following research questions: 1) What are the experiences with and lessons learned from Responsive Quality Assessment (RQA) on CES in Dutch health care organizations? and 2) What is the perceived value of the method of RQA for reflecting on the quality of CES?

  • The assessment was based on a responsive evaluation design in which CES practitioners themselves reflected upon the quality of ethics support within another health care organization

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Various forms of Clinical Ethics Support (CES) have been developed in health care organizations. CES practitioners themselves reflected upon the quality of ethics support within each other’s health care organizations. CES in healthcare organizations is regarded a key service to support health care professionals in reflecting on and fostering the quality of care. A range of CES services have been developed within health care organizations [1,2,3,4,5,6,7] CES includes ethics committees [3, 8, 9] ethics consultation [10], moral case deliberation [6, 7], moral counselling [11], and various forms of ethics. ECQAT enables individuals who rate the quality of ethics consultation to make their assessments based on the written record [22, 23]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call