Abstract

Scientific and public interest in host manipulation by parasites has surged over the past few decades, resulting in an exponential growth of cases where potential behavioural manipulation has been identified. However, these studies dwarf the number of genuine attempts to elucidate the mechanistic processes behind this behavioural manipulation. Ultimately, this imbalance has slowed progress in the study of the mechanisms underlying host manipulation. As it stands, research suggests that the mechanisms of host manipulation fall into three categories: immunological, genomic/proteomic and neuropharmacological, and forth potential category: symbioant-mediated manipulation. After exploration of the literature pertaining to these four pathways, four major trends become evident. First and foremost, there is a severe disconnect between the observed molecular and behavioural shifts in a parasitized host. Indeed, very rarely a study demonstrates that molecular changes observed in a host are the result of active manipulation by the resident parasite, or that these molecular changes directly result in behavioural manipulation that increases the parasite’s fitness. Secondly, parasites may often employ multiple pathways in unison to achieve control over their hosts. Despite this, current scientific approaches usually focus on each manipulation pathway in isolation rather than integrating them. Thirdly, the relative amount of host-parasite systems yet to be investigated in terms of molecular manipulation is staggering. Finally, as a result of the aforementioned trends, guiding mechanisms or principles for the multiple types of behavioural manipulation are yet to be found. Researchers should look to identify the manipulative factors required to generate the molecular changes seen in hosts, while also considering the ‘multi-pronged’ approach parasites are taking to manipulate behaviour. Assessing gene expression and its products during transitional periods in parasites may be a key methodological approach for tackling these recent trends in the host manipulation literature.

Highlights

  • Research indicates that the TNF family of cytokines may be a fruitful avenue of research when it comes to immunological manipulation in host-parasite systems

  • This can potentially result in the manipulation or creation of behaviors that assist in parasite transmission into suitable environments or a definitive host (Moore, 2002)

  • If we look at the induction of compulsive grooming in the cockroach after injection of wasp venom into the central nervous system (CNS), evidence suggests a dopamine-like substance in the venom triggers the grooming behavior (Weisel-Eichler et al, 1999)

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The control parasites can demonstrate when realigning their host’s goals with their own cannot be understated, with many parasitologists regarding hosts as an extended phenotype of the parasite (Adamo, 2013; Hughes, 2013; Poulin and Maure, 2015) Integrating this statement and the quote above, suggests Skinner (partially by semantic accident) was well ahead of his time in assessment of behavior and its origin. The critical analysis of the literature in the first part of this review will culminate in the second part, which will directly address several trends in the host manipulation literature This is aimed to give the reader a comprehensive understanding of the strengths and weaknesses in the current host manipulation literature and suggest directions for future research. The review will primarily draw from three main sources: a special issue of the Journal of Experimental Biology concerning host manipulation, a literature compilation on helminth parasites by Poulin and Maure (2015) and the Web of Science search engine (search terms: parasite∗ AND behavior∗ AND mechanis∗ AND manipula∗ OR effect∗, starting with the most relevant since 2017)

Immunological Manipulation of Vertebrates
Immunological Manipulation of Invertebrates
Player in Immunological Manipulation?
Proteomic Manipulation
Genomic Manipulation
Monoamines and Hormones
Behavioral Manipulation
Viruses as Vectors for Behavioral
Manipulation Literature
Findings
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.