Abstract
Reward theory, which represents the conventional economic view, suggests that the optimal strength of patents depends on a use-creation trade-off; the inevitable production of dead-weight losses in the ex post market for the invention for the purpose of fostering technological progress. This paper demonstrates a caveat in this approach by using game theory. Strong patents increase the value of becoming an inventor. Therefore, more firms are attracted to R&D. However, each firm rationally discounts the probability that it will be the first to obtain a patent, and may therefore reduce or abandon its R&D investment. This leads to a lower invention probability per R&D firm, which in turn may lead to a lower aggregate invention probability. In such cases, weaker patent protections can simultaneously foster innovation and eliminate dead-weight losses in the ex post market for the invention. Hence, contrary to the conventional view, the use-creation trade-off does not exist globally.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
