Abstract

Although relationships between intestinal morphology between trophic groups in reptiles are widely assumed and represent a cornerstone of ecomorphological narratives, few comparative approaches actually tested this hypothesis on a larger scale. We collected data on lengths of intestinal sections of 205 reptile species for which either body mass (BM), snout-vent-length (SVL) or carapax length (CL) was recorded, transforming SVL or CL into BM if the latter was not given, and analyzed scaling patterns with BM and SVL, accounting for phylogeny, comparing three trophic guilds (faunivores, omnivores, herbivores), and comparing with a mammal dataset. Length-BM relationships in reptiles were stronger for the small than the large intestine, suggesting that for the latter, additional factors might be relevant. Adding trophic level did not consistently improve model fit; only when controlling for phylogeny, models indicated a longer large intestine in herbivores, due to a corresponding pattern in lizards. Trophic level effects were highly susceptible to sample sizes, and not considered strong. Models that linked BM to intestine length had better support than models using SVL, due to the deviating body shape of snakes. At comparable BM, reptiles had shorter intestines than mammals. While the latter finding corresponds to findings of lower tissue masses for the digestive tract and other organs in reptiles as well as our understanding of differences in energetic requirements between the classes, they raise the hitherto unanswered question what it is that reptiles of similar BM have more than mammals. A lesser effect of trophic level on intestine lengths in reptiles compared to mammals may stem from lesser selective pressures on differentiation between trophic guilds, related to the generally lower food intake and different movement patterns of reptiles, which may not similarly escalate evolutionary arms races tuned to optimal agility as between mammalian predators and prey.

Highlights

  • Sources were only included if they provided the species, body mass (BM) or snout-vent-length (SVL) or carapace length (CL) of the individuals studied, as well as measurements of all or some of the gut sections

  • Intestinal length information was available for the total intestinal tract (157 species), the small intestine (147 species), the large intestine (141 species), and the caecum (52 species)

  • In analyses using phylogenetical generalized least squares (PGLS), the phylogenetic signal λ varied across its whole range from 0 to 1, depending on the specific dataset; generally, larger datasets had a higher λ (Table 1, S1-S8 Tables in S1 File)

Read more

Summary

Methods

Relevant publications were collated by first using the sources of Franz et al [11] as a starting point, and by performing a literature research in the three search engines Google scholar, PubMed, and Web of Science. Sources were only included if they provided the species, body mass (BM) or snout-vent-length (SVL) or carapace length (CL) of the individuals studied, as well as measurements of all or some of the gut sections (total intestine–TI, small intestine–SI, large intestine–LI including the colon and the caecum). For Podocnemis spp., no corresponding equation was published; we derived our own BM-CL regression equation based on data from various sources [18,19,20,21,22,23,24]

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call