Abstract
We describe a new technique and aim to justify its use in total hip arthroplasty. The incision is short and there is minimal soft tissue dissection: piriformis and most of quadratus femoris remain intact. A meticulous capsular repair is performed. Patients are mobilized without restrictions. One hundred total hip arthroplasties by the standard posterior approach (group 1) were compared with 100 by the less invasive approach (group 2). Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Mean blood loss in group 1 was higher ( P < .0001) and inpatient stay longer ( P < .0001). There was greater improvement in WOMAC scores for up to 1 year in the less invasive group ( P = .027). In conclusion, the less invasive approach is safe and the functional benefits last up to 1 year.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
