Abstract

ObjectivesTo explore lesion-specific exposure parameters on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and evaluate their efficiency for breast cancer diagnosis. MethodsWe reviewed the DBT and FFDM images of 492 women with unilateral breast lesions and compared the findings with a healthy group comprising the contralateral breasts of all patients. The tube voltage (kVp), tube load (mAs), compressed breast thickness (CBT), and mean glandular dose (MGD) for each image were retrieved from the DICOM metadata, and the difference in MGD between DBT and FFDM images (△MGD) was calculated. Three models were developed to discriminate breast cancer: logistic model, comprising traditional risk factors alone; FFDM model, comprising exposure parameters from FFDM images alone, and a hybrid model, comprising traditional risk factors and exposure parameters from DBT and FFDM images. Model performance was assessed in an independent dataset of 189 women by determining the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). ResultsThe malignant group showed greater kVp, mAs, CBT, and MGD values than the benign and healthy groups on both FFDM and DBT. Breast thickness, density, and lesion size were independently associated with △MGD. The hybrid model showed a significantly higher AUC value (0.78 ± 0.04) than the logistic (0.68 ± 0.05) and FFDM models (0.56 ± 0.05). ConclusionsThe breast lesion type has an influence on exposure parameters when using automatic exposure control. Our results provide evidence for lesion-specific exposure parameters, which can be helpful in distinguishing benign lesions from malignancies.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call