Abstract
Integrated to the e-health field, digital therapeutics can be defined as "software, combined or not to a device, in the purpose of prevention, treatment or monitoring of a disease, participating actively in a mechanism of action and based on strong clinical evidence". The aim of this work was to assess the level of digital therapeutics clinical validation and to reflect on their business model. A qualitative study has been conducted and different health actors have been interviewed. The semi-guided interviews made have been analysed through a three-level coding. Twenty-two interviews have been analysed and six categories have been identified. The interlocutors highlighted the leading role of digital therapeutics in the follow-up and prevention, supporting the empowerment of patients. However, the absence of consensus in their definition has led to heterogeneity of definition and a difficulty to limit their scope. Furthermore, the conduct of clinical trials, not really suited for digital therapeutics, forced the editors/manufacturers to search for funding for which availability and continuity are uncertain. By raising the issue of clinical efficacy, demonstration of digital therapeutics, this study has led to new perspectives in assessment and business model. We could see in digital therapeutics a new nature of innovation associated with new organisations of our healthcare system and not necessarily by new therapeutics.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
