Abstract

The calibration certificate is often not very operational and frequently used only for audits. Can it be different? Can a calibration certificate be used by the manufacturer to improve the quality of measurement and production? The FD X 07-012 provides an exhaustive list of the elements which need to be in the certificate: all the factors that impact the uncertainty of the measurement result have to appear. The central element in this document is the measurement result. The industrials have to verify, on the certificate, the connection chain with the standards measurement, used for the calibration. What counts for the industrialist is the conformity of the measuring instrument. To do so, they need to inspect the measurement results. Nevertheless, the interpretation of the last calibration certificate and the conformity of this operation is not enough. The other results have information which is a shame to miss. In fact, the importance of the measurement standards is to be stable in time. The study of the last calibration result can be weighted in function of the other calibrations results. Finally, the calibration is limited. It cannot certify the quality of the measurement process. In fact, the uncertainty of the measurement result is linked to all the factors influencing the measurement process. The periodical surveillances directly on the measurement process is efficient and enables verification. It can also be an indicator to your calibration intervals.

Highlights

  • Dans nombre d’industries, l’unique document faisant foi de la qualité de la mesure est le certificat d’étalonnage, le « saint graal » des auditeurs

  • a calibration certificate be used by the manufacturer to improve the quality of measurement and production

  • The FD X 07-012 provides an exhaustive list of the elements which need to be in the certificate

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dans nombre d’industries, l’unique document faisant foi de la qualité de la mesure est le certificat d’étalonnage, le « saint graal » des auditeurs. En regardant de plus près, le processus de mesure englobe de nombreux facteurs et l’instrument de mesure seul n’en constitue qu’une partie. Alors pourquoi étalonner ses instruments si l’évaluation de la méthode, de l’opérateur, de l’environnement et du mesurande[1] n’est pas réalisée ?

Grandeur que l’on veut mesurer
Moyenne prise sur 12 laboratoires sur le site du COFRAC
Collège Français de Métrologie
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call