Abstract
AbstractThe aim of this study is to identify the performance indicators that Canadian corporations voluntarily disclose based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and to examine their comparability. The results tend to show that all the companies studied disclose few indicators and that the format of these indicators makes comparisons impossible. Additional analyses revealed that while a minority of companies publish some indicators, the vast majority (91%) disclose poor quality information. Accordingly, the companies' strategy appears to be to muddy the waters than actually account for their performance.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
