Abstract

Compensation for professional damages in respect of young victims who remain disabled following an accident or assault remains problematic for personal injury compensation practitioners. However, such professional damages, recognized in principle by the Dintilhac group, were confirmed by the Court of Cassation in terms of full compensation for damages, both for loss of future earnings (PGPF), and professional incidence (IP). Though the burden of proof lies with the victim, experts have a major role to play in assessing these losses by setting out the foreseeable impact of the after-effects on the victim's professional activities, and on his or her professional potential before and after the injury, along with limitations in terms of the jobs the victim is subsequently able to do.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call