Abstract

BY the fourteenth century the descendants of those who had gone from Britain to Ireland in the late twelfth and early thirteenth centuries had come to call themselves 'the English of Ireland' or 'the English born in Ireland'. Or, to be more accurate, they did so when faced by Englishmen from England: within Ireland they described themselves simply as 'the English'. From the 1340s onwards a series of disputes with agents of the king formed a context in which they collectively stressed their Englishness. By the fifteenth century this identity was from time to time problematical, both for those who claimed it and for the metropolis. Historians who work on the late medieval and early modern periods have found it equally so, and have argued about the attitudes and nationality of the settler 'lite. While fourteenth-century evidence has been called upon in these debates, there has been little serious consideration of the first two centuries of the lordship of Ireland.' In what senses were those who went to Ireland during the founding period 'English'? Why does the emphasis upon being English appear to have intensified among their successors as time went by? What does the selfproclaimed Englishness of the fourteenth century signify? How far do the complexities and tensions associated with it foreshadow the betterknown difficulties of later periods? These are the matters I wish to explore. One way of approaching them is through that most familiar of all documents emanating from the medieval lordship of Ireland, the Statutes of Kilkenny. They were enacted in 1366 in a parliament held by Edward III's lieutenant of Ireland, his son Lionel of Antwerp, duke of Clarence and earl of Ulster. Their preamble runs:

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call