Abstract
The synoptic gospels mention John the Baptizer’s criticism of the tetrarch Antipas regarding his marriage to his sister-in-law Herodias. The killing of John on the order of Antipas shows that the latter took very seriously this contestation related to him. This decision is guided by two main factors. First, a comparison of John with other popular first-century bce prophets identified by Flavius Josephus reveals that the eschatological character of his deed, inspired by the national tradition and whose impact on the local population was far from negligible, was inevitably to come up against the philhellenism of Antipas. Then, the tetrarch could not risk that John’s challenge would destabilize public order in his land when he was charged by Rome to ensure peace, as his father Herod before him, on the eastern border, at a moment when relations with the Parthians and Nabataeans were strained.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.