Abstract

This paper examines Descartes's conception of the blind and blindness in the light of the social representations that the philosopher both distanced and requalified. It first shows that Descartes rationalises the representation of the 'blind seer': the philosopher attributes to people who cannot see a form of vision which, unlike the power of divination that the ancient Greeks attributed to certain people, but also the 'inner gaze' typical of the mysticism of the Classical Age, is not in any way supernatural. Descartes thus helps to undo some of the main prejudices that plague blind people. The article goes on to establish that this rationalisation excludes these people from the knowledge that Descartes places in them: the paradoxical knowledge of the process of vision. Finally, it points out that by valuing the sense of sight in a way that perhaps no philosopher had done before him, Descartes also rationalises the predominantly medieval representation of the 'blind ignorant'. The conclusion of the paper is as follows: this double rationalisation produces the ambivalent idea that many people still have of blindness, namely a deficiency that is very poorly compensated for by an ability to see other than with the eyes. By rehabilitating touch, the Enlightenment produced a conception of it that was both rational and in no way deprived.

Highlights

  • To cite this version: Marion Chottin. “ Les aveugles dans l’œuvre de Descartes : Contestation ou perpétuation des représentations sociales de la cécité ?

  • Mots-clés : Descartes, cécité, vue, toucher, représentations Abstract: This paper examines Descartes’s conception of the blind and blindness in the light of the social representations that the philosopher both distanced and requalified

  • It first shows that Descartes rationalises the representation of the ‘blind seer’: the philosopher attributes to people who cannot see a form of vision which, unlike the power of divination that the ancient Greeks attributed to certain people, and the ‘inner gaze’ typical of the mysticism of the Classical Age, is not in any way supernatural

Read more

Summary

Marion Chottin

To cite this version: Marion Chottin. “ Les aveugles dans l’œuvre de Descartes : Contestation ou perpétuation des représentations sociales de la cécité ?. “ Les aveugles dans l’œuvre de Descartes : Contestation ou perpétuation des représentations sociales de la cécité ?. Sociopoétiques, Université Clermont Auvergne, 2021, Sociopoétique du handicap, ￿10.52497/sociopoetiques.1327￿. HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers. L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés

Contestation ou perpétuation des représentations sociales de la cécité ?
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.