Abstract

AbstractEconomists have been aware of the mapping between an Input-Output (I-O, hereinafter) table and the adjacency matrix of a weighted digraph for several decades (Solow, Econometrica 20(1):29–46, 1952). An I-O table may be interpreted as a network in which edges measure money flows to purchase inputs that go into production, whilst vertices represent economic industries. However, only recently the language and concepts of complex networks (Newman 2010) have been more intensively applied to the study of interindustry relations (McNerney et al. Physica A Stat Mech Appl, 392(24):6427–6441, 2013). The aim of this paper is to study sectoral vulnerabilities in I-O networks, by connecting the formal structure of a closed I-O model (Leontief, Rev Econ Stat, 19(3):109–132, 1937) to the constituent elements of an ergodic, regular Markov chain (Kemeny and Snell 1976) and its chance process specification as a random walk on a graph. We provide an economic interpretation to a local, sector-specific vulnerability index based on mean first passage times, computed by means of the Moore-Penrose inverse of the asymmetric graph Laplacian (Boley et al. Linear Algebra Appl, 435(2):224–242, 2011). Traversing from the most central to the most peripheral sector of the economy in 60 countries between 2005 and 2015, we uncover cross-country salient roles for certain industries, pervasive features of structural change and (dis)similarities between national economies, in terms of their sectoral vulnerabilities.

Highlights

  • A key contribution of this paper is to extend the specification of the Markov chain to three different final sectors: (i) the foreign sector, i.e. imports and exports; (ii) the households and government sector and (iii) the profits and investment sector

  • For the median economic system, the relative position of key sectoral vulnerabilities persists through time

  • Countries in group G05 may be described as advanced service economies: it comprises the United States (USA), the UK and high-income small open economies featuring the prominence of knowledge-intensive (69T82OBZ) and financial (68REA, 64T66FIN) services, and a higher relative betweenness centrality of high-tech industries (62T63ITS, 26CEQ)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The analytical device of a Markov chain provides a chance process interpretation of the emerging connectivity between nodes in a network (Grinstead and Snell 1997) Superposing such an interpretation to an input-output structure has been thoroughly worked out by Kemeny and Snell From Blochl et al (2011), to study betweenness centrality and node vulnerabilities in I-O networks, this paper maps a closed I-O system into an ergodic, regular Markov chain

Methods
Closed Input-Output Systems as Regular Markov Chains
Dataset Characteristics and Preparation
Generalised Structural Change Takes Time
Countries are Structurally Different
Summary of Findings and Concluding Remarks
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.