Abstract

Data assimilation (DA) combines incomplete background values obtained via chemical transport model predictions with observational information. Several 3-Dimensional variational (3DVAR) and sequential methods (e.g., ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF)) are used to define model errors and build a background error covariance (BEC) and are important factors affecting the prediction performance of DA. The BEC determines the spatial range, where observation concentration is reflected in the model when DA is applied to an air pollution transport model. However, studies investigating the characteristics of BEC using air quality models remain lacking. In this study, horizontal length scale (HLS) and vertical length scale (VLS) analyses of a BEC were applied to EnKF and ensemble square root filter (EnSRF), respectively, and two ensemble-based DA methods were performed; the characteristics were compared with those of a BEC applied to 3DVAR. The results of 6 h PM2.5 predictions performed for 42 days were evaluated for a control run without DA (CTR), 3DVAR, EnKF, and EnSRF. HLS and VLS respectively exhibited a high correlation with the ground wind speed and with the planetary boundary layer height for diurnal and daily variations; EnKF and EnSRF exhibited superior performances among all the methods. The root mean square errors were 11.9 μg m−3 and 11.7 μg m−3 for EnKF and EnSRF, respectively, while those for 3DVAR and CTR were 12.6 μg m−3 and 18.3 μg m−3, respectively. Thus, we proposed a simple method to find a Gaussian function that best described the error correlation of the BEC based on the physical distance.

Highlights

  • Chemical data assimilation (DA) was proposed for reducing the uncertainty of a chemical transport model (CTM) [1,2,3,4]

  • The difference in the analysis—an initial field improved through Data assimilation (DA)—was investigated for each DA method

  • The length scale diagnosed in the NMC method for calculating the background error covariance (BEC) of the 3-Dimensional variational (3DVAR)—a variational DA—was compared, and the correlation with the meteorological variables was examined

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Chemical data assimilation (DA) was proposed for reducing the uncertainty of a chemical transport model (CTM) [1,2,3,4]. Data assimilation combines (mixes) incomplete background values obtained via CTM prediction with observational information, including errors. The obtained results are close to the true values with lower errors compared with the uncertainty of each model and the observation. Kalman filter (LETKF) [16,17], and ensemble adjustment Kalman filter (EAKF) [18,19] are representative methods applied to CTMs. All studies on DA suggest that the predictability of aerosols, including PM2.5 , can be improved if the initial field and model parameters are improved by assimilating the observed data.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call