Abstract

In Brazil, canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) is caused by Leishmania infantum, presenting a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations. Dogs are the main parasite reservoir in urban areas and canine cases precede human infection. Currently, A2 protein based Leish-Tec® vaccine is the only vaccine commercially available against CVL in Brazil. Considering that the main screening and confirmatory tests of canine infection are serological, it is possible that the antibody response elicited after vaccination interfere with diagnosis, leading to the inability to distinguish between vaccinated and infected animals. In order to identify the specific B-cell response induced after vaccination, A2 protein sequence was screened for main linear B-cell epitopes using in silico prediction (Bepipred) and immunological confirmation by ELISA. Three amino acid sequences were described as potential B-cell epitopes (SV11-SAEPHKAAVDV, PP16-PQSVGPLSVGPQSVGP, and VQ34-VGPLSVGPQSVGPLSVGPLSVGPQAVGPLSVGPQ). Specific IgG ELISAs were performed in sera of 12 immunized dogs living in non-endemic areas, followed for up to 1 year after immunization. The results were compared with those obtained in a group of 10 symptomatic and 10 asymptomatic CVL dogs. All predicted epitopes were confirmed as linear B-cell epitopes broadly recognized by sera from studied dogs. Total IgG ELISAs demonstrated distinct patterns of response between peptides in the immunized and CVL groups. VQ34 peptide was recognized by the majority of sera from vaccinated and symptomatic dogs, and increases after vaccination. PP16 induced low levels of specific IgG that increased 1 year after immunization. Interestingly, a low frequency of reactivity was found against SV11 in naturally infected dogs (symptomatic and asymptomatic), while 83.3% of vaccinated dogs presented positive responses 1 year after immunization. The two animals in the vaccinated group that did not respond to SV11 1 year after immunization presented positive serology both 30 days and 6 months after immunization. In summary, we identified three main linear B-cell epitopes in A2 based vaccine. Moreover, the humoral response against SV11 presented marked differences between infected and Leish-Tec vaccinated dogs, and should be further investigated, in large trials, to confirm its potential as a serological marker able to distinguish between infected and vaccinated dogs.

Highlights

  • Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a vector-borne disease transmitted by female sandflies

  • We have recently demonstrated that in a non-endemic area, and up to 1 year after Leish-Tec® immunization, vaccinated dogs remained negative in the DPP/EIE serological protocol used by the Brazilian Ministry of Health (BMH) [22, 23]

  • Serum of 12 healthy dogs living in non-endemic areas for canine visceral leishmaniasis symptomatic (CVL) and from 20 dogs naturally infected with L. infantum were used in the study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a vector-borne disease transmitted by female sandflies. Lutzomyia longipalpis is the most important vector and the dog (Canis familiaris) the main reservoir in the domestic and peridomestic cycle [2]. As a prophylactic practice to control VL, World Health Organization recommends the systematic treatment of human cases, vector control, and elimination of the domestic reservoir, mainly seropositive-infected dogs [3]. In Brazil, one of the main attempts to control VL is the identification and euthanasia of seropositive dogs in endemic areas [4]. This measure, besides causing social discomfort, does not seem to be effective, since the disease is expanding to non-endemic areas [5]. Dye suggested that the control of phlebotomine population allied to dogs’s vaccination would be more effective in controlling VL than dog culling [7]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call