Legitimate visitors and nectar robbers of Aquilegia formosa have different effects on nectar bacterial communities

Abstract

AbstractMetacommunity structure is strongly influenced by dispersal between habitat patches. Dispersal mode (e.g., active or passively via vector, wind, or water) is recognized to influence metacommunity dynamics, but it is not well understood how within‐mode heterogeneity impacts dispersal and community assembly, particularly for microbial communities. Microbes often rely on flower visitors for dispersal among short‐lived floral nectar habitats, but it is unclear whether flower visitor guilds (e.g., legitimate visitors vs. larcenists) differentially influence nectar microbial diversity and community structure. We surveyed the community of legitimate nectar foragers and nectar robbers, which damage flowers to obtain floral rewards, of Aquilegia formosa. Then, we evaluated how manipulating access by legitimate nectar foragers, primary nectar robbers, and/or secondary nectar robbers influenced the diversity, species composition, and beta diversity of nectar bacteria within individual flowers. A taxonomically diverse insect community visited A. formosa, and visitors differentially influenced nectar bacterial community structure at within‐flower (local) and among‐flower (regional) scales. When legitimate nectar foragers were allowed to access A. formosa, we observed an increase in bacterial diversity and changes in bacterial species composition such that common nectar bacteria had higher relative abundances. In contrast, effects of natural and simulated robbing had little effect on bacterial alpha diversity, but simulated robbing decreased the relative abundance of common nectar bacteria, and natural nectar robbing events reduced beta diversity of nectar bacteria. This work highlights the importance of visitor identity on microbial diversity and species composition in flowers, and, more broadly, suggests that vectors can differentially influence metacommunity structure.