Abstract

The dangers of the excesses of legitimate expectations as a public law doctrine are exposed when it is applied to investment treaty arbitration. Current jurisprudence makes a strong case for restraint by arbitrators. However, recent decisions, have only paid lip-service to deference to sovereignty of states, as the EDF v. Romania decision shows.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call