Abstract
In the current paper, we investigate the impasse over the two forms of Internet governance on trans-national governance issues of the Internet, i.e., multilateral vs. multi-stakeholder. Considering the long controversy over the more appropriate governance form, in this research work, we intend to examine the factors which impact the perception of legitimacy of the different governance forms. The study proposes legitimacy perception influenced by a combination of complementary institutional and rational view. It argues that a stakeholder group’s institutional membership (institutional view) as well as its capabilities to contribute to the collective action of governance (rational view) influences the legitimacy perception of a particular governance form. The study also explores moderating role of Internet affordances in the above relationship. The findings have policy implications in the domain of Internet governance which can be extended to develop theory on governance of information infrastructures.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.