Legislations Mandating Insurance Coverage Are Highly Effective in Delivering Surgical Care of Transgender Patients.

Abstract

Background:Although gender-affirming surgery is increasingly performed, few studies have examined any temporal correlation between legislations mandating transgender care and the actuation of such surgical care.Methods:We assembled a retrospective cohort utilizing the National Inpatient Sample database from 2000 to 2018. We stratified utility trends of gender-affirming surgery based on insurance payer types and regions in a crisscrossing effort to detect any temporal or cause-effect relationship between legislations and outcomes. All regions according to the latest National Inpatient Sample categorization were examined based on the nature of their member state’s legislations relating to gender-affirming care coverage. Diametrically, opposite regions were selected for further comparisons. Interrupted time series analyses were used to demonstrate any significant uptrend since implementation of relevant legislations.Results:In states with explicit inclusion of gender-affirming care, our interrupted time series analyses showed a significant increase in the number of patients on state-dependent insurance (Medicaid and private insurance) receiving gender-affirming surgery around the time during which state legislations began mandating care (P < 0.01) and thereafter (P < 0.01). This significance was not seen in the same regions among patients under nonstate-dependent payers (Medicare and self-pay), nor was it seen in either payer group in states without explicit inclusion of gender-affirming care. At the federal level, statistical significance was noted among Medicare recipients across all states around the time federal legislations took effect and thereafter.Conclusion:Legislations mandating coverage seem highly effective in actuating surgical care of transgender patients in corresponding jurisdictions, which may provide a roadmap for further care expansion.