Abstract
The second case study analyses impacts of self-regulation on international standards for large-scale investment projects, more precisely, on standards that aim to reduce the negative impacts of projects such as hydroelectric dams, pipelines, highways or railroads. Regulation of the negative impacts of these projects has, generally, been undertaken by project financiers who not only commit themselves to so-called environmental and social safeguards but also pass these on to their borrowers, that is, to the corporations implementing the respective projects. Historically, financiers of such large-scale investment projects in the developing world were multilateral development banks. The World Bank was the first to establish such safeguards, followed by the International Finance Corporation (IFC) and many other multilateral development banks. Nowadays, however, commercial banks increasingly take over this business branch and they, too, have committed themselves to safeguards — in the form of the Equator Principles — and have passed these on to their clients.KeywordsCivil SocietyPerformance StandardDispute ResolutionEquator PrincipleSustainability PolicyThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.