Abstract
AbstractThis article draws on a wide range of Shiʽi periodicals and monographs from the 1950s until the present day to investigate debates on the status of Sayyids in Pakistan. I argue that the discussion by reformist and traditionalist Shiʽi scholars(ʽulama)and popular preachers has remained remarkably stable over this time period. Both ‘camps’ have avoided talking about any theological or miracle-working role of the Prophet's kin. This phenomenon is remarkable, given the fact that Sayyids share their pedigree with the Shiʽi Imams, who are credited with superhuman qualities. Instead, Shiʽi reformists and traditionalists have discussed Sayyids predominantly as a specific legal category. They are merely entitled to a distinct treatment as far as their claims to charity, patterns of marriage, and deference in daily life is concerned. I hold that this reductionist and largely legalising reading of Sayyids has to do with the intense competition over religious authority in post-Partition Pakistan. For both traditionalist and reformist Shiʽi authors,ʽulama,and preachers, there was no room to acknowledge Sayyids as potential further competitors in their efforts to convince the Shiʽi public about the proper ‘orthodoxy’ of their specific views.
Highlights
This article draws on a wide range of Shii periodicals and monographs from the s until the present day to investigate debates on the status of Sayyids in Pakistan
(wilaya) but render these in their Urdu or Persian form in case they are taken from a particular Urdu text.”
Both accounts do not offer a discussion of the League trying to appropriate Shii rhetoric
Summary
I will substantiate my claims by demonstrating that there is no significant difference in the characterisations of Sayyids in both ‘reformist’ and ‘traditionalist’ Shii publications in Pakistan since the early s. -. 16This is the main thrust of reformist critique – namely, that the traditionalists would disregard or even deny essential requirements of the sharia. Shiism between Pakistan and the Middle East (Chapel Hill, ), pp. -. a remarkably stable fashion as merely a legal category when discussing their privileges and specific standing in society. A remarkably stable fashion as merely a legal category when discussing their privileges and specific standing in society This acknowledgment does not translate into granting them any particular social role or even a position of religious influence
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
