Abstract
Abstract Studies on the Refugee Convention have paid very limited attention to the notion of family and family rights of asylum claimants in connection with asylum claims based on sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI). Drawing on the notion of ‘legal violence’, this article demonstrates the injurious cumulative effect that a heteronormative, homonormative and Western-centered formulation and implementation of asylum and refugee law has on SOGI claimants when it comes to intimate and family relationships. By relying on a solid body of primary and secondary data, it explores the invisibility of SOGI claimants and refugees’ families and how that invisibility is normalized by European legal frameworks, such as the Dublin (III) Regulation and Family Reunification Directive. To end this ‘legal violence’ and reconnect asylum systems with the lived experiences of SOGI claimants, a principled approach based on human rights and specifically the right to respect for family life is suggested.
Highlights
Studies on the Refugee Convention have paid very limited attention to the notion of family and family rights of asylum claimants in connection with asylum claims based on sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI)
By relying on a solid body of primary and secondary data, it explores the invisibility of SOGI claimants and refugees’ families and how that invisibility is normalized by European legal frameworks, such as the Dublin (III) Regulation and Family Reunification Directive
To end this ‘legal violence’ and reconnect asylum systems with the lived experiences of SOGI claimants, a principled approach based on human rights and the right to respect for family life is suggested
Summary
The international protection system was set up to alleviate the suffering of those escaping persecution and offering them much needed protection. In relation to expectations on SOGI claimants’ lives in the host countries,[71] too often these include intimate relationships with local lesbian, gay, bisexual, transsexual, intersexual and queer (LGBTIQ+) people Our data confirm such heteronormative assumptions, considering that the lack of intimate or sexual bonds in an ‘open’ and ‘free’ European society was treated with disbelief (Maurizio, judge, Italy; survey participant C54, UK). In the specific context of relationships, even plausibility risks being an insurmountable obstacle if decision-makers are resistant to sexual, gender and cultural diversity Such a narrow implementation of refugee law, coupled with other problematic aspects like accommodation and procedures, is instrumental in perpetuating asylum systems that deny individual experiences and produce systematic, but yet invisible and unaddressed, violent effects on SOGI claimants. 71 Among others, Akin, ‘Discursive Construction of Genuine LGBT Refugees’ (2018) 23 Lambda Nordica 21 at 37
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.