Abstract

This research aims to find out the legal rules related to the appointment of Acting Regional Heads from TNI/POLRI High Officers. The proposal to appoint active high-ranking TNI/PORI officers as Acting Regional Heads by the Ministry of Home Affairs has drawn polemics. The method used in this research is qualitative research through a normative legal approach, namely an approach that uses positivist juridical conceptions. The data collected is by using literature studies, scientific articles, legal expert opinions, and other legal sources. The data that has been obtained is then analyzed using qualitative analysis methods. Based on the research results obtained in this study, the following conclusions were drawn: (1) The appointment of Acting Regional Heads from TNI/POLRI elements is contrary to Article 109 Paragraph 2 of Law Number 5 of 2014 concerning State Civil Apparatus, which states "TNI/POLRI can fill high leadership positions after resigning from active service if needed and in accordance with the competencies determined through an open and competitive process." (2) The impact of the appointment of TNI/POLRI officials as acting governors basically violates the provisions of the Pilkada Law and also the State Civil Apparatus Law itself, besides that the appointment is also a setback for the continuity of Indonesian democracy that has been running so far.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call