Abstract

In the Ottoman province of Serbia (initially the Belgrade Pashalik), the Roma had the same legal status as elsewhere in the Empire: they paid a special, Gypsy poll tax (Gypsy cizye; in Serbian: ciganski harac) and were subject to the personal jurisdiction of the Gypsy poll tax collector (Gypsy cizyedar; ciganski haraclija). After a successful uprising in 1815, the Serbs acquired a degree of autonomy, gradually broadened and formalized through a series of sultanic decrees, to culminate in a Constitution granted to Serbia by the Sultan in 1838. The Serbs progressively expanded their jurisdiction at the expense of the Ottoman authorities in every respect, including the powers over the Roma. Starting in 1818, the Serbian Prince began to collect the Gypsy tax in the name and on behalf of the Ottoman authorities; in 1826, he leased it from them, and by 1830 it was included in the lump annual tribute paid by Serbia to the Porte. The Ottomans thereby lost all jurisdiction over the Roma, excepting a small number of those employed as servants in the Turkish garrisons. Although Serbian authorities otherwise consistently endeavoured to replace the inherited Ottoman laws and customs with legislation modelled on that of West European Christian states, in respect to the Roma no attempt was made to alter the Ottoman system of special jurisdiction and taxation. In fact, the first changes in this system were consistent with the contemporary reforms proclaimed by the Porte: those nomadic Roma who wished to settle were to be given free land and to pay ordinary taxes. The same policy was proclaimed in Serbia in 1839, when the already sedentary Roma were entered into general tax registers, but no success was achieved in settling the nomads (a majority were eventually settled in the decade between mid-1860s and mid-1870s). The Gypsy tax collector (haraclija) was transformed into an institution (haracluk), with its own budget and staff, retaining personal jurisdiction over the nomadic Roma. This jurisdiction was progressively narrowed, to be abolished in 1853, together with the haracluk. However, the nomads remained subject to the poll tax, now collected by regular authorities. In consequence, they were also disenfranchised, as (since 1869) only the adult males who paid property and/or income (but not poll) tax had a right to vote. (Disenfranchisement, on the same grounds, affected other, non-Roma, categories, such as servants.) In 1884 the poll tax was abolished and the Roma achieved the same legal status as other Serbian citizens.

Highlights

  • Serbs acquired a degree of autonomy, gradually broadened and formalized through a series of sultanic decrees, to culminate in a Constitution granted to Serbia by the Sultan in 1838

  • The Ottomans thereby lost all jurisdiction over the Roma, excepting a small number of those employed as servants in the Turkish garrisons

  • The first changes in this system were consistent with the contemporary reforms proclaimed by the Porte: those nomadic Roma who wished to settle were to be given free land and to pay ordinary taxes

Read more

Summary

PRAVNI STATUS ROMA U KNEŽEVINI SRBIJI

Apstrakt: Cilj rada je da, na osnovu analize zakonodavstva i administrativne prakse, ispita pravni status Roma u Srbiji 1815–1884. Cilj rada je da ispita pravni status Roma u Srbiji kao autonomnoj provinciji osmanske države i utvrdi da li su (i kako) osmanski propisi i običaji koji se tiču romske populacije menjani lokalnim (srpskim) zakonodavstvom i administrativnom praksom. Veka, Romi su u Osmanskom carstvu uživali nesravnjeno bolji položaj nego u zapadnoevropskim zemljama. Çelik, F., 2003, The Limits of Tolerance: The Status of Gypsies (Roma) in the Ottoman Empire, Studies in Contemporary Islam, 1–2, p. U svakom slučaju, taj hibridni poreski status je stavljao bar neke Rome u nepovoljan pravni položaj, jer su zahvaljujući njemu Romi islamske veroispovesti morali da plaćaju poreze koje muslimani inače ne plaćaju. U početku, status romske populacije je u svemu ostao isti kakav je bio u Beogradskom pašaluku pre ustanaka, ali se s vremenom menjao propisima koje je donosila autonomna srpska vlast, i to naročito u dvema oblastima: poreskom sistemu i ograničavanju personalne jurisdikcije ciganskih haračlija

CIGANSKI HARAČ
CIGANSKE HARAČLIJE I CIGANSKI HARAČLUK
PRELAZAK IZ NOMADSKOG U SEDENTARNI STATUS
Do značajne promene u poreskopravnom statusu Roma došlo je
NASELJAVANJE ROMA
UKIDANJE HARAČA I STICANJE PRAVA GLASA
Zaklju ak
SUMMARY
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call