Abstract
The extent of economic analysis on which Competition Authorities (CAs) and Courts rely, in assessing whether specific conducts violate Competition Law (CL), depends crucially on the legal standard adopted. We examine the factors influencing the choice of legal standards, and hence the extent of economic analysis and evidence applied in CL enforcement, focusing on the recent literature. We suggest explanations about why the decisions of CAs in relation to the utilization of economic evidence may diverge from the social welfare-maximizing decisions. These explanations rely on the realistic assumption that CAs derive utility not only (or primarily) from the social welfare impact of their decisions but also from their reputation or public image. Finally we consider some preliminary empirical evidence providing support for these explanations.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
