Abstract
The purpose of the study is to comprehend and define the substantive differences between the concepts and phenomena of legal rule-making and legal rule-making. The research methodology is represented by a set of philosophical and general scientific methods. Determinants of which are comparative and hermeneutic, as well as socio-cultural and axiological approaches. Results. It is shown that legal investigations’ conceptual and terminological accuracy is one of the foundations of qualitative research. It is proved that rigor and clarity in the application of the conceptual apparatus in legal research contribute to a fuller disclosure of the specifics of legal phenomena, and is also an indicator of the level of a philosophical and general culture of the researcher. Thus, the study will contribute to the improvement of the conceptual and terminological apparatus of the theory of law and philosophy of law. Scientific novelty. The paper proves that the concepts of "legal rule-making" and "legal rule-making" are not identical, but denote different, in essence, the processes of formation of legal norms. Practical significance. The results of the study can be used in further philosophical and theoretical-legal scientific research, preparation of special courses.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Scientific and informational bulletin of Ivano-Frankivsk University of Law named after King Danylo Halytskyi
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
