Legal regulation of human somatic rights: transplantation of human organs and biological tissues in Ukraine and foreign countries

Abstract

The article examines the problems of legal regulation of transplantation of organs and tissues of the human body in Ukraine and foreign countries. Emphasis is placed on legal and ethical difficulties arising in the field of transplantology. It is noted that the right to «mechanize the body» has a number of specific features, namely: the specific nature of the object of these rights - the human body, which is the object of property rights and currently has mainly a monetary value expression; natural dependence on knowledge of biology, genetics, medicine, technology. Their existence and implementation are possible only with the help of achievements of scientific and technical progress; novelty, which has a different degree of expression, depending on the type of protected result of disposal of body or life; ambiguous attitude from the side of religion, morality, ethics, politics; inextricable connection with constitutional (fundamental) human rights in view of the special connection with personal (natural) rights and the peculiarity as an independent group of human rights; exclusivity in terms of its legal consequences in the process and as a result of their implementation. With any change in the physical embodiment of a person, the subjective aspect of legal relations changes, that is, many connections of various branches of legal regulation (civil, marital and family, constitutional, etc.) are affected; the degree of their recognition and implementation reflects the level of development of the state and society in general, etc. It is emphasized that individual somatic rights are reflected both in the legislation of Ukraine and in the legislation of foreign countries. For example, the right to transplant organs in national legislation is not used as a right to dispose of one's body, but as a certain necessity, a medical indication. In order to regulate the issue of organ donation, the legislation of individual states prescribes the practice of establishing special procedures for obtaining the donor's consent to extract a transplant from him (Belgium, Greece, Turkey). Given the lack of transplants for transplant operations, it is important to develop educational work at the state level, explaining to citizens the need to issue voluntary consents for the posthumous use of their donor material. It is worth making proposals for the development and adoption of the State Program of Ukraine aimed at the development of donation. This program should provide organizational, legal and preventive state measures for the promotion and development of legal donation in Ukraine; proposals for the development of a national legal mechanism aimed at encouraging voluntary posthumous donation, which would be based on the lifetime legally formalized consent of potential donors to the posthumous free use of their donor material.